<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Clinical Trials on Big Muddy</title><link>https://muddy.jprs.me/tags/clinical-trials/</link><description>Recent content in Clinical Trials on Big Muddy</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 22:32:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://muddy.jprs.me/tags/clinical-trials/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Regulatory uncertainty threatens biotech innovation</title><link>https://muddy.jprs.me/links/2026-02-15-regulatory-uncertainty-threatens-biotech-innovation/</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 22:32:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://muddy.jprs.me/links/2026-02-15-regulatory-uncertainty-threatens-biotech-innovation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Another post from the &lt;em&gt;Clinical Trials Abundance blog&lt;/em&gt;, this time by Ruxandra Teslo, on how the recent refusal-to-file by the US FDA for Moderna&amp;rsquo;s new mRNA influenza vaccine increases regulatory uncertainty and threatens innovation across the entire biotechnology sector. The decision &lt;a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/10/health/fda-moderna-mrna-flu-vaccine"&gt;reportedly came&lt;/a&gt; after the country&amp;rsquo;s top vaccine regulator, Dr. Vinay Prasad, overruled career staff to quash Moderna&amp;rsquo;s application. This is just &lt;a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/vaccine-funding-pulled-mrna-1.7601981"&gt;one more blow against mRNA vaccine technology&lt;/a&gt; to come from Health and Human services, the US federal health agency led by the world&amp;rsquo;s most prominent antivaxxer, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The case for sharing clinical trial data</title><link>https://muddy.jprs.me/links/2026-02-10-the-case-for-sharing-clinical-trial-data/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 19:39:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://muddy.jprs.me/links/2026-02-10-the-case-for-sharing-clinical-trial-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Saloni Dattani of the excellent &lt;a href="https://worksinprogress.co/"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Works in Progress&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; magazine (and formerly of &lt;a href="https://ourworldindata.org/"&gt;Our World in Data&lt;/a&gt;) launched a new Substack today called &lt;em&gt;The Clinical Trials Abundance blog&lt;/em&gt;. The first post is on the case for sharing clinical trial data. We have been gradually moving toward mandatory reporting of &lt;a href="https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/10/11/769348119/canadas-decision-to-make-public-more-clinical-trial-data-puts-pressure-on-fda"&gt;clinical trial &lt;em&gt;results&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (though enforcement is &lt;a href="https://www.trialstracker.net/"&gt;another&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://fdaaa.trialstracker.net/"&gt;question&lt;/a&gt;), but sharing data would be one step further. Even though clinical trials rely on the trust (and often money) of the public, it can be very difficult to gain access to the raw results, even if journal article authors claim they are &amp;ldquo;available upon request&amp;rdquo;. A norm of clinical trial data sharing would not only increase the confidence in published results but also aid future drug development, reduce expensive redundancy, and improve meta-analyses (which are often forced to rely on heterogeneous summary measures).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>