<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Psychology on Big Muddy</title><link>https://muddy.jprs.me/tags/psychology/</link><description>Recent content in Psychology on Big Muddy</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 12:14:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://muddy.jprs.me/tags/psychology/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Divergent Association Task, a measure for creativity</title><link>https://muddy.jprs.me/links/2026-02-02-the-divergent-association-task-a-measure-for-creativity/</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 12:14:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://muddy.jprs.me/links/2026-02-02-the-divergent-association-task-a-measure-for-creativity/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The Divergent Association Task is a short, simple test introduced in 2021 claiming to measure creativity. Taking only a minute and a half, it asks participants to &amp;ldquo;generate 10 nouns that are as different from each other as possible in all meanings and uses of the words&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the instructions say to &amp;ldquo;avoid specialized vocabulary (e.g., no technical terms)&amp;rdquo;, I imagine you might score higher if you&amp;rsquo;ve just finished &lt;a href="https://www.kaptest.com/study/gre/top-52-gre-vocabulary-words/"&gt;cramming wordlists for the GRE&lt;/a&gt;. Researchers have used this test to &lt;a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-25157-3"&gt;compare human and AI creativity&lt;/a&gt; (though the use of GPT-4 in this article with a January 2026 publication date speaks to the incompatibility of AI research with traditional publication timelines).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>